Why former AGF, Aondoakaa, can’t hold public office for life – Supreme Court

0
4041

Uba Group

BY NSIKAK EKANEM

The Supreme Court of Nigeria has offered reasons for barring former Attorney General of the Federation, Michael Aondoakaa, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, from holding public office in the country for life.

In a unanimous judgment delivered by Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, the Supreme Court had on December 10, 2021 affirmed a judgment of the Court of Appeal, Calabar division, which had earlier upheld a Federal High Court decision that barred Aondoakaa, who was Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice under President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, from occupying public office in Nigeria.

In the matter titled, SC.939/2015, Aondoakaa was appealing to the Supreme Court against the judgment delivered by Court of Appeal, Calabar division on September 3, 2015, which affirmed the decision, held by Federal High Court, Calabar division on June 1, 2010.

The five-man judicial panel at the Supreme Court, which also awarded N2 million against the appellant in favour of the 1st respondent (Emmanuel Obot), were Justices Mary Peter-Odili, Kekere-Ekun, Mohammed Lawal Garba, Ibrahim Saulawa and Emmanuel Agim.

In a 58-page certified true copy of the judgment sited by this reporter, Kekere-Ekun, who gave the led judgment stated that “The appellant (Aondoakaa), as the Chief Law Officer of the Federation and a Senior Advocate of Nigeria to boot was reckless and acted in a manner most unbecoming of the occupant of such an exalted office.”

Aligning with position held by Justice Olubunmi Oyewole in the Court of Appeal judgment, Kekere-Ekun quoted reasons advanced by the lower court in its decision.

Oyewole was of the view that “The fact leading to this appeal captured a most sordid low in administration of justice in this country.

“It is unthinkable that the occupier of the exalted office of Attorney General would subvert the ends of justice, as was crudely done in this case by the appellant.

“That office should never again be occupied by individuals of such poor quality as the appellant.

“It is ironic that the appellant should approach the same temple he so brazenly desecrated for succor against the consequences of his appalling conduct.”

“To restore the dignity of the legal profession and reinforce the confidence of the administration of justice”, Oyewole had also launched a call on the body of Nigerian lawyers, saying, “The Nigerian Bar Association is invited to the facts of this case and the judicial reactions thereto and subject the appellant to its appropriate disciplinary processes.”

The facts prompting the litigations, which had dragged on for 15 years, is traceable to the People’s Democratic Party primary election held in December 2006 for nomination of candidate for Uyo Federal Constituency of Akwa Ibom State for the general elections of April 2007.

Obot, who emerged winner of the primary election, was substituted with the name of Bassey Etim after he (Obot) was “duly presented to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) as the PDP candidate.”

On December 12, 2007, the Court of Appeal, Calabar division in appeal numbered CA/C/45/2007 delivered judgment in favour of Obot, ordering the President of the Court of Appeal to set up a new Tribunal to adjudicate over Obot’s petition in Uyo.

Following a petition he received from Etim, Aondoakaa, in his capacity as the AGF, wrote a letter to the President of the Court of Appeal, urging him not to comply with the decision of the Court of Appeal, Calabar division, which had ordered the constitution of new panel of judges to hear the matter.

Notwithstanding Aondoakaa’s letter, the President of the Court of Appeal went ahead by setting up a new panel of judges in compliance with the order of the court.

The new panel gave judgment on April 18, 2008 that Obot be sworn into the House of Representatives as the member representing Uyo Federal Constituency, and Etim’s appeal to the Court of Appeal was dismissed with an order that INEC should issue Certificate of Return to Obot.

Curiously, though by virtue of Section 246(2) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, the decisions of the Court of Appeal are final regarding appeals emanating from National and State Houses of Assembly elections, the former AGF wrote to the then chairman of INEC, Maurice Iwu, urging him not to obey the judgment of the Court of Appeal, which he described in the letter as “obvious desecration of the institution of the judiciary.”

At the same time, he also wrote to the Speaker of the House of Representatives advising him to disregard the judgment but “to allow the status quo ante to remain until the last word is heard from the Supreme Court.”

Consequent upon Aondoakaa’s letters to the INEC chairman and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Obot was not issued Certificate of Return nor sworn into the office he was elected to serve the people of Uyo Federal Constituency, hence he slammed a law suit on May 15, 2009 against the then AGF in his personal and official capacity at the Federal High Court, Calabar division through his lawyer, Uwemedimo Nwoko (SAN).